Remembering the Apostle Bartholomew

Bartholomew, one of the twelve apostles of Christ (Matthew 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:14; Acts 1:13) is generally believed to have been the same individual who is called Nathanael in John’s Gospel. The justification for this opinion is that in the first three gospels Philip and Bartholomew are constantly named together, but Nathanael is nowhere mentioned. In the fourth gospel Philip and Nathanael are mentioned in combination, but nothing is said of Bartholomew. Of the gospel writers, John uses Nathanael to describe this apostle while the other three gospels (and the Acts of the Apostles) refer to him as Bartholomew. Herbert Lockyer has harmonized this apparent discrepancy:

Actually the full name of the apostle we are now considering is Nathanael Bartholomew for the consensus among the best and most reliable commentators is that the Nathanael John mentions (1:45-51; 21:2) is the Bartholomew spoken of in the lists of the apostles in the Acts and the other three gospels (Matt. 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:14, and Acts 1:13). Perhaps we can try to gather the evidence for the identification of Nathanael with Bartholomew. It was common enough for a man to have more names than one -a fact the apostolic circle illustrates. Simon was surnamed Peter and Bar-jona; Matthew was called Levi; Lebbaeus, Thaddaeus, and Judas are names of one and the same person as we shall presently discover. It is a general practice today for people to have several names. For instance, my full signature is Herbert Henry John Lockyer. Bar-Tolmai then, corresponding to Bartholomew, was Nathanael’s surname. . . .

Evidence that Bartholomew and Nathanael are one and the same person may be adduced in this way. Nathanael is twice named by John, and on the first occasion John places him among the first disciples to respond to the call of Jesus. The somewhat lengthy account of his call would be altogether disproportionate unless he were afterward elevated to the apostolate. Then John mentions Nathanael as being among the seven disciples who went back to their fishing (21:2) and it is to be assumed that the word disciples here is equivalent to the word apostles, especially as Nathanael is chosen to be a personal witness of the Lord’s resurrection-a great and glorious privilege![1]

His Introduction to Jesus (ca. 27)

As implied by the Gospel of John, it is likely Bartholomew was a native of Canna in Galilee (John 21:2). He was introduced to Jesus by Philip; upon seeing Bartholomew approach him, Jesus pronounced a declaration concerning his character which has made his name almost synonymous with sincerity or integrity: “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no guile” (John 1:47).

Post-Resurrection Participant (ca. 30)

Bartholomew was one of the disciples to whom Christ appeared at the Sea of Tiberias following his resurrection (John 21:2). He was also a witness of the ascension and was among those who returned to Jerusalem with the other disciples (Acts 1:4, 12, 13).

As is true of many of the other apostles, little is known of the subsequent life and ministry of Bartholomew beyond vague traditions. The famed church historian Eusebius, suggested that when, toward the end of the second century, Christian missionary Pantaenus embarked on a mission to India, he found they already possessed the Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew which had been left there by the Apostle Bartholomew. In support of this position Jerome offers a similar account and adds that Pantaenus brought the copy of Matthew’s Gospel back to Alexandria with him.

However, the title of “Indians” was applied by ancient writers to many different nations, and for this reason, it is difficult to determine the precise scene of Bartholomew’s labors as reflected by various Church historians. Mosheim and Neander believed Bartholomew labored in a portion of Arabia Felix, which was inhabited by Jews for whom a Hebrew gospel would be of particular benefit. Historian Socrates believed that it was the India bordering on Ethiopia; and still further, Sophronius suggests that Bartholomew preached the Gospel of Christ to the inhabitants of India Felix.

Martyrdom and Memorial

Just as it is difficult to determine with accuracy where Bartholomew invested most of his ministry, it is also difficult to accurately chronicle the last days of his life. Church tradition suggests, however, he was flayed alive with a sharp knife in one of three locations—Albanopolis, Armenia, or in India. For this reason three knives, symbolizing completeness, are employed in his apostolic symbol.

The life and ministry of the Apostle Bartholomew is remembered on August 24 by the Western Church and on June 11 in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Related Articles

Thomas Jefferson's Wall of Separation Letter

American History | January Articles | Role of Pastors | Thomas Jefferson

On January 1, 1802, Thomas Jefferson penned a letter that has been employed by secularists against America's historic legal foundation. Repeatedly members of the Supreme Court have relied upon secular interpretations of both the writings and personal example of Thomas Jefferson. Employing Jefferson against the previous historic rulings of the Supreme Courts and the Christian foundation of American law, the Supreme Court, since 1947, has relied upon skewed and misinterpreted excerpts taken from the writings of Thomas Jefferson. A significant conRead more...

Washington's January 1, 1795 Thanksgiving Proclamation

American History | Presidential Proclamations | Thanksgiving

Because nearly all American colonies under British control had established state churches,[1] America's Founding Fathers were not willing to raise issues that would unnecessarily divide them in their efforts to establish a stable government. For this reason, a promise was made not to establish a federal or national church when writing the Constitution and amended Bill of Rights. However, as the following proclamation demonstrates, America's Founders were not ashamed of their Christian Faith. The history behind the proclamation and its obserRead more...

Watch-night Service: From Ale-house to Revolution

American History | Christian Calendar (Holidays) | Christian History | Christian Living | December Articles

For generations of Americans, the memory of candles flickering at the close of watch-night services—as one year waned and another began to wax—is one that evokes reverent appreciation for the spiritual fervor of by-gone days. Though the observance of the watch-night service began to wane at the end of the twentieth century, its origin in both the British Isles and America are significant chapters in the spiritual life of these nations. In America, few realize the place that one watch-night service had in the birth of the nation. The origin and Read more...

The Truth about Separation of Church and State

American History | Christian Calendar (Holidays) | Christian History | December Articles | Role of Pastors

Since 1947, liberal judges have reinterpreted the historical context of the First Amendment that ensured that congress (or the federal government) would not establish a state church or elevate any single denomination over any of the other Christian denominations. America's Founding Fathers regarded the First Amendment as a guarantee that the federal government would not attempt to make any one Christian denomination the dominant and preferred denomination of the nation. Since the late 1940s (and particularly the early-1960s), liberal judges havRead more...

Article Notes and Sources

[1]Lockyer, Apostles of the Bible, 56-57.